Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruscio, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ruscio, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruscio, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ruscio, A. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Structure-Based Approach to Psychological Assessment

Matching Measurement Models to Latent Structure

John Ruscio

Elizabethtown Collegerusciojp{at}etown.edu.

Ayelet Meron Ruscio

The Pennsylvania State University

The present article sets forth the argument that psychological assessment should be based on a construct’s latent structure. The authors differentiate dimensional (continuous) and taxonic (categorical) structures at the latent and manifest levels and describe the advantages of matching the assessment approach to the latent structure of a construct. A proper match will decrease measurement error, increase statistical power, clarify statistical relationships, and facilitate the location of an efficient cutting score when applicable. Thus, individuals will be placed along a continuum or assigned to classes more accurately. The authors briefly review the methods by which latent structure can be determined and outline a structure-based approach to assessment that builds on dimensional scaling models, such as item response theory, while incorporating classification methods as appropriate. Finally, the authors empirically demonstrate the utility of their approach and discuss its compatibility with traditional assessment methods and with computerized adaptive testing.

Key Words: taxometrics • latent structure • measurement • classification • scaling

Assessment, Vol. 9, No. 1, 4-16 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/1073191102091002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AssessmentHome page
J. Ruscio
Assigning Cases to Groups Using Taxometric Results: An Empirical Comparison of Classification Techniques
Assessment, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 55 - 70.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
S. Hong and S.-Y. Min
Mixed Rasch Modeling of the Self-Rating Depression Scale: Incorporating Latent Class and Rasch Rating Scale Models
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2007; 67(2): 280 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
D. H. Gleaves, J. D. Brown, and C. S. Warren
The Continuity/Discontinuity Models of Eating Disorders: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention
Behav Modif, November 1, 2004; 28(6): 739 - 762.
[Abstract] [PDF]