Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vacha-Haase, T.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vacha-Haase, T.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Personality Disorders
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reliability Generalization: Exploring Reliability Variations on MMPI/MMPI-2 Validity Scale Scores

Tammi Vacha-Haase

Crystal R. Tani

Lori R. Kogan

Renee A. Woodall

Colorado State University

Bruce Thompson

Texas A&M University and Baylor College of Medicine

The study utilized the measurement meta-analytic method called "reliability generalization" to examine (a) the typical reliability, (b) the variability of score reliability, and (c) the factors predicting variability of score reliability on the three MMPI validity scales. Across studies the reliability co-efficients on the three validity scales ranged from .16 to .93, with the F scale having the most variability, as might be expected. Regression analyses suggested that the age of participant best predicted the variation of reliability co-efficients.

Key Words: Reliability generalization • reliability • MMPI • Minnesota Multiphasic Personality • Inventory • validity scale • reliability co-efficients

Assessment, Vol. 8, No. 4, 391-401 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/107319110100800404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
M. Vassar and W. Hale
Reliability Reporting Across Studies Using the Buss Durkee Hostility Inventory
J Interpers Violence, January 1, 2009; 24(1): 20 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
C. S. Miller, A. L. Shields, D. Campfield, K. A. Wallace, and R. D. Weiss
Substance Use Scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: An Exploration of Score Reliability Via Meta-Analysis
Educational and Psychological Measurement, December 1, 2007; 67(6): 1052 - 1065.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
D. J. Ryngala, A. L. Shields, and J. C. Caruso
Reliability Generalization of the Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale
Educational and Psychological Measurement, April 1, 2005; 65(2): 259 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
T. Vacha-Haase, R. K. Henson, and J. C. Caruso
Reliability Generalization: Moving toward Improved Understanding and Use of Score Reliability
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 562 - 569.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. Thompson and C. Cook
Stability of the Reliability of LibQual+TM Scores a Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis Study
Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2002; 62(4): 735 - 743.
[Abstract] [PDF]