Assessment

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tsushima, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Tsushima, V. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tsushima, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Tsushima, V. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Assessment, Vol. 8, No. 2, 205-212 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/107319110100800208
© 2001 SAGE Publications

Comparison of the Fake Bad Scale and Other MMPI-2 Validity Scales with Personal Injury Litigants

William T. Tsushima

Straub Clinic and Hospital, Honolulu, Hawaii

Vincent G. Tsushima

Goodsill, Anderson, Quinn, and Stifel, Honolulu, Hawaii

Five MMPI-2 validity scales were evaluated with 120 personal injury litigation patients (LP) and 208 clinical patients (CP) along with 43 normal participants (NP). The validity measures included the Fake Bad Scale (FBS), Infrequency scale (F), Back Infrequency scale (Eb), Infrequency-Psychopathology scale (F[p]), and the Dissimulation scale-2 (DA2). Results showed that only the FBS significantly differentiated the LP and CP, whereas the LP and CP scored significantly higher than the NP on FBS, F, Fb, and Ds2. The content of the FBS, with several items from the Hypochondriasis (Hs) and Hysteria (Hy) Scales, appears to enhance the FBS' ability to detect the somatic overreporting often observed with personal injury claimants. The authors suggest that the FBS may be a useful index of symptom magnification when employed within a comprehensive assessment of malingering in personal injury plaintiffs.

Key Words: MMPI-2 • Fake Bad Scale • validity scales • personal injury • litigation • malingering


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AssessmentHome page
J. L. Etherton, K. J. Bianchini, K. W. Greve, and M. T. Heinly
Sensitivity and Specificity of Reliable Digit Span in Malingered Pain-Related Disability
Assessment, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 130 - 136.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AssessmentHome page
R. Rogers, K. W. Sewell, M. A. Martin, and M. J. Vitacco
Detection of Feigned Mental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of the MMPI-2 and Malingering
Assessment, June 1, 2003; 10(2): 160 - 177.
[Abstract] [PDF]