Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jacob-Timm, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caruso, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Jacob-Timm, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test with Young Adolescents

John C. Caruso

University of Montana

Susan Jacob-Timm

Central Michigan University

This study examined the factor structure of the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT) in 375 11- to 14-year-olds (normative sample) and 60 sixth- and eighth-graders (cross-validation sample). Previous exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the KAIT have included optional subtests, which are often not administered in practice, and have not tested oblique versus orthogonal two-factor models. In this study, three factor models were tested via confirmatory factor analysis for the six core subtests of the KAIT: a one factor general intelligence (g) model, an orthogonal fluid intelligence (Gf)-crystallized intelligence (Gc) model, and an oblique Gf-Gc model. The orthogonal Gf-Gc model fit poorly in both samples. The g model fit only the cross-validation sample. The oblique Gf-Gc model fit both samples and fit significantly better than the g model in both samples. Additional tests of factor structure, path co-efficients, and covariance between Gf and Ge indicated that the data from both samples fit even the most restrictive oblique Gf-Gc model tested. KAIT users can be confident that the Fluid and Crystallized IQs from the KAIT are adequate representations of a robust and interpretable factor structure when only the core subtests are administered to young adolescents.

Key Words: KAIT • factor structure • adolescents • Gf • Gc • general intelligence

Assessment, Vol. 8, No. 1, 11-17 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/107319110100800102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AssessmentHome page
J. C. Caruso
Increasing the Reliability of the Fluid/Crystallized Difference Score from the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test with Reliable Component Analysis
Assessment, June 1, 2001; 8(2): 155 - 166.
[Abstract] [PDF]