This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bagby, R. M. Articles by Bacchiochi, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bagby, R. M. Articles by Bacchiochi, J. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Can the MMPI-2 Validity Scales Detect Depression Feigned by Experts?

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Clarke Division, University of Toronto

Robert A. Nicholson

University of Tulsa

Tom Buis

York University

Jason R. Bacchiochi

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Clarke Division

Major depression is one of the most frequently presented disorders for claims of psychiatric disability. Evidence also suggests that many individuals making claims of disability exaggerate or even fabricate mental illness. These facts suggest that the detection of feigned depression is an important task in psychiatric disability claim assessments. In this study, the capacity of a number of MMPI-2 validity scales and indicators to detect feigned depression was examined. Twenty-three mental health professionals with specific expertise and significant experience in assessing and treating major depression were asked to complete the MMPI-2 as if they were suffering from major depression. The MMPI-2 protocols of this sample were compared to those of a sample of patients diagnosed with major depression. Results indicated that the validity scales F, back F (FB), and the Dissimulation scale (Ds) were highly successful at distinguishing MMPI-2 protocols of feigned depression from bona fide depression. Replicating results from previous studies, however, FB proved most effective, outperforming all other validity scales and indicators, including F and Ds. These findings suggest that even experts are unable to feign major depression successfully on the MMPI-2, and that the FB scale might be the most effective indicator for detecting feigned depression.

Key Words: Malingering • depression • MMPI-2 • validity scales • disability

Assessment, Vol. 7, No. 1, 55-62 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/107319110000700104


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V Kuperman Narratives of psychiatric malingering in works of fiction Med. Humanit., December 1, 2006; 32(2): 67 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Marshall and R. M. Bagby The Incremental Validity and Clinical Utility of the MMPI-2 Infrequency Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Scale Assessment, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 417 - 429. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Arbisi, Y. S. Ben-Porath, and J. McNulty Refinement of the MMPI-2 F(p) Scale is Not Necessary: A Response to Gass and Luis Assessment, June 1, 2003; 10(2): 123 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Lucio, C. Duran, J. R. Graham, and Y. S. Ben-Porath Identifying faking bad on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory--Adolescent with Mexican Adolescents Assessment, March 1, 2002; 9(1): 62 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF]