This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bolt, D. M. Articles by Neumann, C. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bolt, D. M. Articles by Neumann, C. S. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Score Metric Equivalence of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) Across Criminal Offenders in North America and the United Kingdom

A Critique of Cooke, Michie, Hart, and Clark (2005) and New Analyses

University of Wisconsin

Robert D. Hare

University of British Columbia and Darkstone Research Group, Canada

Craig S. Neumann

University of North Texas

David Cooke and colleagues have published a series of item response theory (IRT) studies investigating the equivalence of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) for European versus North American (NA) male criminal offenders. They have consistently concluded that PCL-R scores are not equivalent, with European offenders receiving scores up to five points lower than those in NA when matched according to the latent trait. In this article, the authors critique the Cooke et al. analyses and demonstrate how their anchor item selection method is responsible for their final conclusions concerning the apparent lack of equivalence. The authors provide a competing IRT analysis using an iterative purification strategy for anchor item selection and show how this more justifiable approach leads to very different conclusions regarding the equivalence of the PCL-R. More generally, it is argued that strong interpretations of IRT analyses in the presence of uncorroborated anchor items can be highly misleading when evaluating score metric equivalence.

Key Words: psychopathy • item response theory • differential item functioning • Psychopathy Checklist-Revised • PCL-R

Assessment, Vol. 14, No. 1, 44-56 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1073191106293505


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?