This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cunningham, M. D. Articles by Sorensen, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cunningham, M. D. Articles by Sorensen, J. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Actuarial Models for Assessing Prison Violence Risk

Revisions and Extensions of the Risk Assessment Scale for Prison (RASP)

Dallas, Texas, mdc{at}markdcunningham.com

Jon R. Sorensen

Prairie View A&M University

An investigation and extension of the Risk Assessment Scale for Prison (RASP-Potosi), an actuarially derived scale for the assessment of prison violence, was undertaken through a retrospective review of the disciplinary records of the first 12 months of confinement of a cohort of inmates entering the Florida Department of Corrections in 2002 and remaining throughout 2003 (N = 14,088). A near replication of the RASP-Potosi and additional analyses based on other weighted logistic regression models were performed on an inmate subsample for whom all information categories were available (n = 13,341). Younger age and shorter sentences were associated with increased violent misconduct. Older age, drug conviction, and higher educational attainment were associated with reduced violent misconduct. Regardless of whether the original RASP-Potosi or its progeny were utilized, or the custody level of the inmate sample, the models were modestly successful in predicting prison violence, with the area under the curve (AUC) ranging from .645 to .707.

Key Words: actuarial • risk assessment • prison violence • RASP • scale

Assessment, Vol. 13, No. 3, 253-265 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1073191106287791


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Campbell, S. French, and P. Gendreau The Prediction of Violence in Adult Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Instruments and Methods of Assessment Criminal Justice and Behavior, June 1, 2009; 36(6): 567 - 590. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Kuanliang, J. R. Sorensen, and M. D. Cunningham Juvenile Inmates in an Adult Prison System: Rates of Disciplinary Misconduct and Violence Criminal Justice and Behavior, September 1, 2008; 35(9): 1186 - 1201. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. D. Cunningham and J. R. Sorensen Predictive Factors for Violent Misconduct in Close Custody The Prison Journal, June 1, 2007; 87(2): 241 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. F. Edens and K. S. Douglas Assessment of Interpersonal Aggression and Violence: Introduction to the Special Issue Assessment, September 1, 2006; 13(3): 221 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]