Assessment

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edens, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edens, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Assessment, Vol. 11, No. 1, 109-112 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1073191103261474

Effect of Response Distortion on the Assessment of Divergent Facets of Psychopathy

John F. Edens

Sam Houston State University edens{at}shsu.edu

Recent evidence suggests that the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI) is composed of two orthogonal factors, one representing traits such as dominance and low anxiety (PPI-I) and a second that reflects more socially deviant aspects of psychopathy (PPI-II). To assess whether response sets differentially affect these factors, the present research reanalyzed data from two dissimulation studies in which college students completed the PPI both honestly and with instructions either to "fake good" (n = 186) or "fake bad" (n = 143). PPI-II scores decreased significantly in the fake-good condition (d = –.86) and increased significantly when faking bad (d = 2.65). PPI-I scores were unaffected by attempts to feign serious psychopathology (d = .10) and actually increased in the fake-good condition (d = .53). These findings significantly qualify previous conclusions about the effect of response distortion on the PPI.

Key Words: psychopathy • dissimulation • response sets • malingering • Psychopathic Personality Inventory


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 AssessmentHome page
E. Heene, R. De Raedt, A. Buysse, and P. Van Oost
Does Negative Mood Influence Self-Report Assessment of Individual and Relational Measures? An Experimental Analysis
Assessment, March 1, 2007; 14(1): 86 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Youth Violence and Juvenile JusticeHome page
M. G. Vaughn and M. O. Howard
The Construct of Psychopathy and its Potential Contribution to the Study of Serious, Violent, and Chronic Youth Offending
Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, July 1, 2005; 3(3): 235 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Emotional and Behavioral DisordersHome page
M. G. Vaughn and M. O. Howard
Self-Report Measures of Juvenile Psychopathic Personality Traits: A Comparative Review
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, January 1, 2005; 13(3): 152 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]