This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Morrissey, C. Articles by Taylor, J. L. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morrissey, C. Articles by Taylor, J. L. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Structural, Item, and Test Generalizability of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised to Offenders With Intellectual Disabilities

¹ Rampton Hospital, Nottinghamshire, UK, and Institute of Mental Health, Nottingham, UK
² Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
³ University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
⁴ University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
⁵ Tayside University, Tayside, UK and Castlebeck Care, Northumberland, UK
⁶ Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK, and Northumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Trust, Northumberland, UK

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: catrin.morrissey{at}nottshc.nhs.uk.

	Abstract

The Psychopathy Checklist–Revised (PCL-R) is the most widely used measure of psychopathy in forensic clinical practice, but the generalizability of the measure to offenders with intellectual disabilities (ID) has not been clearly established.This study examined the structural equivalence and scalar equivalence of the PCL-R in a sample of 185 male offenders with ID in forensic mental health settings, as compared with a sample of 1,212 male prisoners without ID.Three models of the PCL-R’s factor structure were evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis.The 3-factor hierarchical model of psychopathy was found to be a good fit to the ID PCL-R data,whereas neither the 4-factor model nor the traditional 2-factor model fitted.There were no cross-group differences in the factor structure, providing evidence of structural equivalence. However, item response theory analyses indicated metric differences in the ratings of psychopathy symptoms between the ID group and the comparison prisoner group.This finding has potential implications for the interpretation of PCL-R scores obtained with people with ID in forensic psychiatric settings.

First published on October 1, 2009
Assessment 2009, doi:10.1177/1073191109344052


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?