This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McCrae, R. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McCrae, R. R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Counterpoint of Personality Assessment: Self Reports and Observer Ratings

Gerontology Research Center National Institute on Aging, NIH Baltimore, MD

In musical counterpoint, two or more different voices sound together in ways that illuminate the possibilities of the musical theme. Similarly, self-reports and observer ratings together may tell us more about personality than either could separately. This article reviews convergence between these two data sources and illustrates ways in which they can be used jointly in personality research to rule out response biases and estimate stability and heritability of personality traits. A measure of profile agreement is introduced and a rule of thumb is proposed for distinguishing agreement from disagreement on specific traits in individual cases. Averaging may be useful when there is agreement about individuals across observers; when there is disagreement, further information should be sought to resolve the competing hypotheses offered by the discrepant ratings.

Assessment, Vol. 1, No. 2, 159-172 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/1073191194001002006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Han, G. N. Burns, N. C. Weed, G. T. Hatchett, and N. K. S. Kurokawa Evaluation of an Observer Form of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2009; 69(4): 675 - 695. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Ready, D. Watson, and L. A. Clark Psychiatric Patient- and Informant-Reported Personality: Predicting Concurrent and Future Behavior Assessment, December 1, 2002; 9(4): 361 - 372. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. R. McCrae Facts and Interpretations of Personality Trait Stability: A Reply to Quackenbush Theory Psychology, December 1, 2001; 11(6): 837 - 844. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. Herbst, R. R. McCrae, P. T. Costa Jr., J. R. Feaganes, and I. C. Siegler Self-Perceptions of Stability and Change in Personality at Midlife: The UNC Alumni Heart Study Assessment, December 1, 2000; 7(4): 379 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. Schul and A. D. Vinokur Projection in Person Perception among Spouses as a Function of the Similarity in their Shared Experiences Pers Soc Psychol Bull, October 1, 2000; 26(8): 987 - 1001. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. E. Kurtz, P. A. Lee, and J. L. Sherker Internal and Temporal Reliability Estimates for Informant Ratings of Personality Using the NEO PI-R and IAS Assessment, June 1, 1999; 6(2): 103 - 113. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. K. S. Kurokawa and N. C. Weed Interrater Agreement on the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) Assessment, March 1, 1998; 5(1): 93 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]